| By Gloria Laker Aciro
In Southern Sudan
Tuesday, 29th July, 2008
The high prices of food in the northern and West Nile districts of Uganda may soon reduce following increased food and cash crop production by the Sudanese farmers.
Traders have been exporting livestock and foodstuffs such as cassava, beans, rice and maize from Uganda to Southern Sudan, which they sold for huge profits. This caused food shortage in Uganda leading to rising food prices.
However, farmers in Southern Sudan have now taken on agricultural production after the recent introduction of modern farming methods.
Because of this, they will start consuming what they produce and they will not need to import food from Uganda.
With the new development, the northern Uganda districts bordering Sudan will also start getting food from Sudan as the first harvest starts in August.
Farmers in Southern Sudan have also formed groups.
One such group is Savannah Farmers Cooperative (SFC) Society, which is encouraging Sudanese farmers to engage in agriculture and use modern farming methods. The group was formed in 2001 during a famine in Southern Sudan. More than 400,000 farmers are benefiting from the cooperative society.
Zamba Duku, the managing director of the cooperative society, says the farmers were refugees in Uganda and other countries.
Duku said SFC trains them in better farming practices and rents out to them tractors and trucks to plough their land.
Cash crop growing
Farmers are encouraged to grow food crops with great cash potential, such as maize, beans, cassava and groundnuts. Being the staple foods of the people, such crops have a good market potential.
The farmers have also embarked on growing Indian food crops like green and black grams and chicken peas, which they plan to export to Europe and North America.
What farmers say
Joseph Nyombe says he has become independent. “I no longer wait for relief food like I used to. I can also send my children to school. I have also improved on production and I hope to do much better,” he said.
Jennifer Kiden also thanks SFC for training her in the use of modern farming methods, which have led to an increase in food production. “I now get enough food for my family and sell the rest for money to meet other family needs.”
US
Envoy On South Sudan's Economic Potential
By Darren Taylor - Washington
14 February 2007
In public comments made in recent weeks, the United States
special envoy to Sudan, Andrew Natsios has called southern
Sudan a potential breadbasket for Africa. He's also expressed
confidence in the ability of the south to control corruption.
Southern Sudan emerged in 2005 from a two-decade war that
had pitted the Sudan People's Liberation Movement/Army (SPLM/A)
against the northern government of Sudan in Khartoum. According
to human rights groups, the conflict killed more than 2 million
people, and left hundreds of thousands displaced.
Natsios said in Washington DC recently that southern Sudan's
leaders were struggling to implement good governance practices,
and that there appeared to be substance to allegations that
some donor funds that had been allocated to development in
the region had been misappropriated.
"Are there people who've tried to enrich themselves?
There appears to be some evidence of that," Natsios said,
before qualifying his statement by saying that the corruption
that had happened in the south was not "wide-scale"
and that it could be dealt with rapidly by putting the necessary
"systems" and "institutions" in place.
He revealed that the leadership of southern Sudan had requested
"technical help" from the international community
to launch a fight against graft.
"Corruption is a problem in many developing countries
where a lot of money is moving through the system, and the
systems aren't there to control abuse," Natsios added.
"I know many of the southern leaders; I've known them
for many years. I believe that they care about their people.
You know, some countries I go to - there's a kleptocracy;
the elites are rapacious, corrupt and predatory. That is not
true in southern Sudan."
The envoy lauded Sudan's Vice-President and SPLM/A leader,
Salva Kiir, as a "man of integrity". It was ironic,
Natsios said, that President Omar al-Bashir's government in
the north was using the allegations and " rumors"
of graft in the south to regularly attack the SPLM administration
– yet the Khartoum administration was itself ranked
by international anti-graft groups as one of the most corrupt
in the world.
Natsios remained optimistic that southern Sudan would in the
future emerge as an area of great economic importance to Africa.
'The biggest thing that's changed for the south is that all
the food prices are dropping in the cities because there's
no war. And the merchants are pouring in from Nairobi and
Uganda. There were only a hundred businesses in Yei (one of
the most important towns in southern Sudan) when I visited
there five years ago. Four years later, there are 1 800 small
businesses. People in the south are very entrepreneurial."
While the envoy attached great importance to the development
of health and education in southern Sudan, he emphasized that
the greatest priority for the region should be the building
of roads.
"We're finding out that the roads system is most important,
because that is what's causing the economy to begin to boom
now," Natsios enthused. "It's one of the richest
agricultural areas in Africa! Southern Sudan could feed all
of Africa. Its extremely rich soils; there are 10 or 20 million
… head of cattle in the south."
With most people in southern Sudan being farmers or herders,
agriculture is of primary importance to the area. Natsios
was convinced that, with the introduction of modern agricultural
technology, southern Sudan would one day be transformed from
a place of perennial famine, to a continental breadbasket.
BOMBAY PIONEERS A NEW WAY TO DO MISSIONS
By Odhiambo Okite
The Rev. Calvin Richard Bombay talks development
economics with the fluency of a World Bank expert, but when
recently Brig. Gen. Zamba Duku, Speaker of the legislature
of West Equatoria State of South Sudan, invited him to address
an extra-ordinary session of the House of Representatives,
he gave a hard-hitting, unapologetically political and prophetic
message. Quoting only and frequently from the Bible, he laid
out the current political challenges facing South Sudan, the
quality of leadership the situation demands, and the content
of the hope the people have for their lives and their country
today and in the future.
The spectre of the brutal civil war, which
ended only recently, still looms large in the memories and
expectations of South Sudanese. Bombay established his awareness
of this when he called on the legislators “not to waste
the deaths of 2,200,000 men, women and children, by taking
selfish personal advantage of what the future should hold
for every citizen. ... The success or failure of the Government
of South Sudan [depends upon] your acts of integrity, honesty,
ethical thinking and behavior, . . . or your involvement in
corruption and selfishly motivated decisions.”
It was an unusual role for a “foreign”
missionary. For 17 years, Bombay was a Pentecostal Assemblies
of Canada missionary in Uganda and Kenya, while those
countries were experiencing dramatic political transformations.
In those days, foreign missionaries were advised to avoid
like the plague any involvement in controversial political
issues.
Times have changed. We live today in a global
era. Geographical borders have grown thin, and so have the
differences between job descriptions for local and foreign
church workers. Previously, foreign missionaries were expected
to help spread the Gospel, to engage in such social and economic
development work which had direct impact on the living standards
of individuals and families, and to assist in the management
of church-related affairs. Otherwise, foreigners stayed away
from political action and personal development work, even
with respect to such positive values as self-reliance and
human dignity. National politics, community organizing, and
agitating for the fulfillment of individual aspirations were
strictly left to locals, and even then, generally discouraged.
The job description of the modern “foreign”
missionary would perhaps include truth-telling on issues like
civil rights and just, equitable, participatory and sustainable
development. Many church leaders would be uncomfortable with
this approach, but Bombay says: "If your living for Jesus
does not cause you some inconvenience, some discomfort, some
sacrifice or some risk, then you should very seriously examine
the measure of your obedience to the will of God."
The situation in South Sudan and Bombay’s
participation in it for the past decade helped him to build
the vision and practice of this challenging and comprehensive
missionary venture. In the twenty years of the civil war,
South Sudan was “hell on earth,” according to
Steven Wondu, who then represented South Sudan at the United
Nations as well as in Washington, D.C. and Ottawa, and who
inspired Bombay to visualize and design his project. “Villages
are raided and dwellings razed down,” he said. “Crops
are burnt, livestock is looted, women are raped, boys and
girls are enslaved: the rest are massacred.”
“In fact, there are no Southern Sudanese
today who are living at home,” he said. “Aerial
bombardment of civilian villages and camps was the daily routine
of the Sudan Air Force. The population was constantly kept
on the run to prevent them from growing crops and establish
basic service institutions like hospitals and schools.”
Bombay bought and freed some of the slaves.
He walked into a village left smoldering following a raid
by Sudanese government soldiers and tribal militia, and saw
food granaries and fields heavy with ripe food crops incinerated
by agents of their own government. He saw men, women and children
fighting like dingos for food dropped by aid agencies. He
witnessed the extent to which people can inflict cruelty on
others, even upon those who are in every way similar to them,
but he also saw how despair can turn people into animals.
Bombay and Wondu figured out that food drops
are unacceptably expensive, not only in human terms, but also
financially. A ton of maize flown from Lokichoggia in northern
Kenya and dropped in Bar el Ghazal costs US $2,000/- according
to reliable sources, but would cost only US$175/- when grown,
processed and shipped from within South Sudan. The worst thing,
though, is that people became dependent on food dropping from
the sky.
They therefore conceived of a project whose
objective would be "To give the people an opportunity
to restore their dignity by looking after themselves."
They would achieve this by setting up farms for mass food
production, run by the South Sudanese themselves.
Standing before the parliamentarians of West
Equatoria legislature, Bombay knew he was addressing the elite
of South Sudanese politics. West Equatoria covers Juba, South
Sudan’s only semi-developed urban center, and has a
relatively well educated House of Representatives, which is
expected to set trends for the other nine states.
Given the opportunity to “preach”
about rural community development, he chose to confess that
he is a devout Christian and a missionary at heart.
The speech lasted thirty minutes, but the
lively discussion that followed it went on for more than four
hours.
Bombay used the opportunity to speak with
the political elite of South Sudan’s most important
state, and poked his finger directly into a most sensitive
festering wound in Africa today. He told them not to “become
just like so much of Africa: riddled with corruption, graft,
greed and self-serving decisions.”
“There are enemies among you,”
he declared. “Their personal and secret plans are to
personally milk the system for everything they can get for
themselves and their friends.” Such leaders will make
this country “degenerate into chaos, corruption and
moral decay which will destroy the future of South Sudan.”
The speech then became prophetic. “You
will have to be leaders in righteousness, in character, in
honesty, in transparency and in truth,” he told the
hushed House. . “You WILL do this, or you will fail!”
History was being made in another way in
that little building, which was awfully inadequate as a “parliament.”
Bombay addressed the members with a Bible in his hands, testing
the limits of the year-old Peace Agreement, which gave South
Sudanese states freedom of religion and a measure of autonomy.
“What I have to say to you today is as firm and true
as God Himself, and comes from His Holy Word, the Bible.”
During the question and comments, many of
the members of the Legislature assured Bombay that they too
would monitor the farms of the Savannah Farmers Cooperative
and be on guard against corruption. Bombay had no way of knowing
which of the members might be Christian or Moslem.
Religion was a major factor in the civil
war which last year’s peace pact ended. The war lasted
20 years and cost South Sudan more than two million lives,
and devastated its society and economy.
The Sharia law, was introduced in the early
1980s when a small, but determined and fanatical clique called
Moslem Brotherhood took over the Khatoum government in a palace
coup, and systematically began to restrict severely the practice
of other religions. Southerners were “expected”
to become Moslems, to speak Arabic and to be generally Arabized.
It was the people’s resistance to this forced Islamization
and Arabization which the Khartoum government called rebellion
and provided the pretext for the civil war and full scale
genocide which followed.
Freedom of religion, belief and worship shall
be guaranteed under this new Comprehensive Peace Agreement
signed on January 9, 2005 in Nairobi, Kenya. The Peace Agreement
also guaranteed that “a suitable atmosphere will be
maintained for practicing, worship, proselytization and preaching.”
Indeed, a few days after his appearance in
parliament, Bombay participated in the largest evangelistic
events ever in Juba, when by the end of the meetings, 50,000
people gathered well into the night to hear the Christian
Gospel. Thousands made public decisions to follow the Christian
faith.
While we can, we must help. The Peace Agreement
continues on a very fragile basis. Khartoum is known for its
non-adherence to any of the agreements it has signed over
the years since 1989. There may be a limited window of opportunity
to kill the dependency syndrome in southern Sudan. "For
years the UN has been flying supplies into the troubled region,
and now the population has come to expect food to fly in from
the sky. People have become dependent on being fed through
airdrops. Not only is this demeaning, the process is outrageously
expensive.
But now Bombay has set up an organization
called Cal Bombay Ministries, whose specific purpose is to
establish food security through mass mechanized farming. He
already has four operating farms of varying large acreages.
Thousands of acres await development. Food security is a viable
dream.
Through the Savannah Farmers Cooperative,
a Sudanese entity, small local farmers are able to multiply
their own crops through the contractual use of the more than
twenty tractors already available from the four farms. Zamba
Duku projects that such use of the tractors “can quadruple
the produce from a local five acre farm, producing beyond
their own subsistence and providing cash for improvement of
life, education and adequate housing.”
Hell has moved 450 miles north to Darfur.
But in the presently peaceful south, there is a revolution
of expectations. Continued peace, electricity, potable water,
improved living conditions, political stability, education
for their children: these are the new dreams.
Bombay says, “I cannot walk away from
what I know can be done with some help from outside southern
Sudan. To restore human dignity and establish food security
is basic. The only way I see this happening is by working
from the grass roots up: by giving their economy a kick-start
by taking advantage of their greatest asset – agricultural
development on vast fertile lands.”
Cal Bombay Ministries can be found at www.calbombayministries.org
End Note:
Odhiambo Okite died on May 25th, 2006 just
as he was finishing this article. His wife, Carol Ann Okite
agreed to let me finish the few corrections and the last paragraphsfor
which he had asked me information. His son Mirambo, in his
eulogy, said of his father Odhiambo,
“What a life! My father was born on
Rusinga Island in Lake Victoria, deep in the interior of Africa.
He became a citizen of the world. His strongest tribal affiliation
was to humanity. The people he met over the course of his
life include Lyndon Johnson, Desmond Tutu, Queen Elizabeth
II, Indira Gandhi and many others. He was fluent in four languages.
He visited the four corners of the globe. Those of us who
have been lucky enough to sit and chat with him know that
he had an amazing story for every day of the year, like his
surreal experience walking in the ‘whites only’
line with Billy Graham in Apartheid South Africa; or walking
his school fees, in the form of a goat, and losing it to a
predator; or his experience at the March on Washington.
He suffered the indignity of torture at the
hands of the government he served. He had more reason than
anybody here to be jaded and cynical, yet he held fast to
his faith in love. He took some of the hardest blows life
could throw at a man, yet I never heard him once utter a word
in self-pity or vengefulness or pettiness. This was the kind
of man he was. How sweet, how precious those smiles, that
laughter, those jokes, those songs after all he suffered.
Odhiambo went blind because of the tortures
he endured. His last years as a journalist were spent with
his family, and many hours working on his ‘talking computer’.
|